mallorys_camera: (Default)
[personal profile] mallorys_camera
Today would have been my mother’s 77th birthday... Is there life after death? Who knows? Maybe (probably) it was a complete fantasy, but I felt Tom around for a long time after he died, invisibly strolling through my living room, toasting me with spectral Laguvulin, guiding my career choices. Whereas my mother abandoned me the moment she gave up the ghost.

I don’t believe in anything, of course. My relentlessly logical mind won’t allow it. But if I could believe in whatever I liked, I’d believe in reincarnation – and hope my mother is in a happier life. The one we shared never did very much for her.

###


At 7:30am it was minus seventeen degrees below zero. Un-fucking-believable.

The cold has frozen my kitchen pipes. I have to wash all my dishes in the bathtub.

###


So, Saturday night I went on what I guess was a real date: Michael took me to hear Dava Sobel read. A trio of musicians playing Renaissance music accompanied her.

I don’t know whether I enjoyed myself or didn’t enjoy myself.

Certainly, Michael and I have things in common that I haven’t had in common with anyone but Eleanor for many years. For example – he’s a very practical, pragmatic guy but he’s deeply into astrology. I wouldn’t describe myself as being into astrology anymore – as it turns out the sun doesn’t go round the earth! – but I think, however it works, it’s useful and I know a helluva lot about it. Michael was kind of yr typical overachieving science geek till he came to Cornell in 1970 and fell under the influence of a charismatic professor who spun him around 180 degrees, got him interested in esoteric philosophy, classical music, art, meditation. There was a whole circle of people who fell under the charismatic professor’s spell. Eventually they bought land together on Lake Seneca’s shore, and formed a nonprofit. Professor is now dead, land is worth millions, and Michael spends a significant portion of his nonworking week brainstorming with the group, which is more or less a kind of static group: should they try to recruit more members? or should they accept the fact that like the Shakers, the teachings die with them? Not that any of them are in imminent danger of dying, of course.

I don’t think I’m particularly attracted to Michael, nor do I sense that he’s particularly attracted to me. It’s a kind of dry, cerebral overlap. I mean – I like him, I enjoy talking with him. But what hanging out with him really did for me was that it reminded me that I was 40 years old when I met Ben – that’s quite old. I had 40 years worth of experiences which I more or less pushed to one side when I fell in love.

I suppose you might characterize many of them as intellectual experiences.

Now, Ben is very brilliant but he’s not an intellectual – what’s the difference? Oh, I suppose it has to do with argument. Intellectuals like references and sidebars; their Vedas have Upanishads, their Old Testament has the Torah: they argue from the mind. Brilliant people, on the other hand, argue from their hearts.

###


Earlier that week I’d found myself walking down an icy street lockstep with Ben, looking over at him and realizing from something about his posture, He’s got fairly significant osteoporosis… Probably the cause of all those cramps he gets so frequently – calcium deficiency.

And I realized the reason why Jayne LeGro is never going email about a meeting is because he doesn’t want her to. One of her functions in his life is to protect him from me. That made me quite sad for a moment, as though I was standing at a station and he was leaning out the window of a train, and we were saying our goodbyes to one another – knowing we would never meet again…

Anecdotal medicine

Date: 2011-01-24 06:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] old-cutter-john.livejournal.com
I'd venture to guess that Ben hasn't been absorbing calcium because he has celiac disease, and it's mild enough that he hasn't figured it out. Happened to me. Figured it out on July 28, 2009, and went on a gluten-free diet. Made a tremendous difference.

Not your problem, of course.

Re: Anecdotal medicine

Date: 2011-01-26 12:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mallorys-camera.livejournal.com
Not my problem. Correct! :-)

Date: 2011-01-25 03:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nodressrehersal.livejournal.com
Intellectuals like references and sidebars;they argue from the mind. Brilliant people, on the other hand, argue from their hearts.

What an interesting observation.

Date: 2011-01-25 08:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gringo-in-tj.livejournal.com
Yep, this sentence grabbed me, too, I never considered it in that way.

Date: 2011-01-26 12:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mallorys-camera.livejournal.com
There's got to be some reason why I'm not an intellectual! :-)

Date: 2011-01-26 12:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mallorys-camera.livejournal.com
Well, just kind of an off the cuff observation.

Date: 2011-01-25 07:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sulphuroxide.livejournal.com
well. stupid people argue from their hearts too... especially really REALLY stupid people... (not calling ben stupid, just saying..)

Date: 2011-01-26 12:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mallorys-camera.livejournal.com
Do stupid people actually argue? Or do they just repeat their programming in a loud, obnoxious manner? Serious question.

Date: 2011-01-25 03:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slfisher.livejournal.com
It's not usually that cold there, if it's any consolation.

Date: 2011-01-26 12:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mallorys-camera.livejournal.com
Yeah. I believe the recent cold spell set records here.

Date: 2011-01-25 03:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nokomisjeff.livejournal.com
I always disliked the term "Intellectual," of which many in the arts and literary movements hijacked from the truly smart people. A bunch of friends run a great site that discusses the hijacking of the word "intellectual" from the real smart people. The article is "Edge:The Third Culture," and gives a great explanation on how the second rate minds stole the word because of better communication skills and nooriginal thinking to occupy their time. This discussion discusses C.P. Snow's excellent work on the definitions and history of "Intellectual." http://edge.org/about_edge.html My own personal definition of intellectual, "A person who knows a lot about a particular subject, however never discusses that subject in public and only speaks about other subjects (whether or not he knows anything about it) th their adoring sycophants. Paul Krugman and Noam Chomsky are poster children for my definition. If anyone tells me he/she is an intellectual, I run away as fast as I can and try to find really smart people. Smart trumps intellectual every time.

Date: 2011-01-26 12:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a1icey.livejournal.com
"their vedas have upanishads, their old testament has the torah"

you mean the talmud? i really like this idea.

Date: 2011-01-26 12:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mallorys-camera.livejournal.com
I do mean the Talmud! :-) What a great editor you would make. (In a sense, of course, law is the constant commentary to everything else we create.)

Date: 2011-01-26 01:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a1icey.livejournal.com
i've been editing dustin's application for a jewish organization's academic fellowship lately, so i guess i am in that mode :)

Profile

mallorys_camera: (Default)
Every Day Above Ground

June 2026

S M T W T F S
 1 23 4 5 6
78 9 1011 12 13
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 15th, 2026 07:10 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios